Two of the world's largest insurance companies, Lloyds and Swiss Re, have recommended to other insurance companies to write in exclusion clauses against paying compensation for illnesses caused by continuous long-term non-ionising radiation exposure.[1,2] . The recent Austrian insurance company AUVA report confirms DNA-breaks caused by non-ionising radiation, but the report leaves many issues open. Remember what Swiss Re wrote in 2005?
"For the insurance industry, this standoff gives rise to an extremely dangerous risk of change composed of two parts: the classical development risk, that is, the possibility tha new research findings will demonstrate electromagnetic fields to be more dangerous than has hitherto been assumed; and the sociopolitical risk of change, in other words, the possibility that changing social values could result in scientific findigs being evaluated differently than they have been thus far. "
Update 24th September: This is bad news for those employers who expose their workers heavily to non-ionising radiation. Precedents: There are already several cases where the worker got compensation because their tumours etc were caused by mobile phone
& other occupational EMF exposure [1,2,3,4,5] . And the amount of cases will most likely increase.Lloyd’s of London and Swiss RE Liability coverage issues for Wireless
Information on the Fine Print Manufacturers Warnings
Read the Open Letter to Honorable Senator Rosalyn Baker About Cell Phone Manufacturers Safety Warnings
Learn What States Across the USA Are Doing to Inform Citizens
http://www.parentsforsafetechnology.org/usa-city-and-state-action-.html
No comments:
Post a Comment